inboundpass.com - Covering Philippine college basketball / UAAP, NCAA, PCC

Comments

• dugongpula     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 2:17 am
  

  kalokohan

• kablamers     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 2:44 am
  

  Rules are rules…
  lets just face the consequence like a true BEDAN will do…

• red_cub     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 7:25 am
  

  Yes, rules are rules. What’s bothering me really is that the NCAA Mancom is the one who initiated it, aren’t they the ones who are going to decide on it too? Maybe I’m too tough on them but it’s just because of the history between NCAA Mancom vs. San Beda in the past two years… :-) Actually, this is a rivalry in the making! LOL.

• red_cub     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 7:27 am
  

  Yes, rules are rules. I love following the rules and just so the rules can be implemented, I would take that forfeiture punishment with no problem at all and I hope we serve as an example for those who violate the laws no matter how big or as small as this one. But what’s bothering me really is that the NCAA Mancom is the one who initiated it, aren’t they the ones who are going to decide on it too? Maybe I’m too tough on them but it’s just because of the history between NCAA Mancom vs. San Beda in the past two years… :-) Actually, this is a rivalry in the making! LOL.

• BedanRoar     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 8:01 am
  

  Protest in poor taste
  SPORTING CHANCE By Joaquin M. Henson
  Wednesday, July 23, 2008 Philstar

  Good insight coming from a La Salle alumus.

• rhk111     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 8:12 am
  

  For the record, the rule is VAGUE, and the infraction does not merit such a heavy sanction.

  Di bale, sige, kung ganun gusto nila, fine. Malay mo, makaganti kami. If I were Benilde, I would be very careful in terms of following the rules from hereon. I hope na walang butas na makikita later.

• by_the_book     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 8:25 am
  

  rules are very clear regarding uniforms in both the uaap and ncaa.

  all players must be in uniform if fielded in. the rules don’t have to mention players should be in “same or similar” uniforms or should have the same logos, patches, etc. because that would already be redundant. the word “uniform” is enough to indicate UNIFORMITY!

  and the penalties are clear about violating this rule which is forfeiture of the game. you don’t need an interpretation anymore on these than the guy next to you.

  i remember when i was still in high school and i was wearing a shirt having the old patch of our school. it was still the same design except the color of the thread used then was of a different shade. i was reprimanded by our prefect for that and was warned about it and was told to replace it. back then, our schools still instill the correct values to its students.

• by_the_book     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 8:30 am
  

  nowadays, people from all walks of life, in government, school, in entertainment, etc. always come up with an excuse if accused of something. and the accuser tends to drop the accusation if the price is right.

  this simple thing about the uniform violation by san beda and ateneo should not be discussed anymore because it should already have been dealt with by the proper authorities. but until now, the respective boards don’t seem to care.

  you don’t need a genius or someone with solomonic-qualities to decide on this issue.

• by_the_book     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 8:34 am
  

  i don’t think the protest is in poor taste. if you see a wrong thing done, the most noble thing to do is to not let it go and have it corrected. csb protested just to make sure the issue will be dealt with.

  baka mamaya sabihin pa ng mancomm wala naman nag protest. in fact kahit hindi nag protest ang csb, mancomm should penalize sbc. kaya lang, mukhang dito na patungo kaya nag protest ang csb.

• rhk111     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 8:47 am
  

  The protest was in poor taste. How could anybody take a win in the boardroom, when in fact they got blown out of the court by 23 points?

  There is such a thing as “konsensiya” and “delicadeza”, and UP realizes that. They could not take their conscience telling them they lost, even if they won with such an inconsequential infraction.

  Its not like there was a fight out there or something. Its not even the uniform. Its just the damn patches, and for that you forfeit a game? (Shakes head)

• rhk111     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 8:54 am
  

  Let me quote this post from “trencher_k” from the gameface.ph forums:

  “Sir Joe, according to Tony Atayde’s column in inboundpass, this was the Rule alluded to:

  Rule #6
  Playing Uniform and School ID

  6.1 All athletes shall wear the OFFICIAL PLAYING TEAM UNIFORM in all the games/matches of the current NCAA Season.

  6.5 Any athlete whose playing uniform does not conform to the
  preceding rules shall be INELIGIBLE to participate in a given game/match.

  9.2 A team shall lose the game by FORFEITURE if and when:

  9.2.1 An INELIGIBLE athlete is fielded or enters the playing court with an intent to play. He and his team shall lose the game/match BY FORFEITURE.

  I guess the controversy stems from the definition of the OFFICIAL PLAYING TEAM UNIFORM which the Rule, as cited, did not define explicitly. Sam was wearing his Bantay-Bata uniform which was basically the exact same uniform except for the placement of the sponsorship logos. I think the same issue was also brought up in the recent UP-Ateneo game where Kirk Long and Vince Burke were also spotted wearing jerseys with logos different from those used by the other ADMU players. UP, however, took the higher ground when it chose not to file the protest.”

• justice     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 9:05 am
  

  HINDI NIYO BA NAIINTINDIHAN…MALAKAS ANG SAN BEDA RED LIONS NGAYON…so gagawa ng paraan ang lahat para bumagsak ang SAN BEDA…kahit ano pupuniin nila para lang matalo sila….mga walang kwenta!!! Rules are rules…bigay na namin ang win namin…pero sa amin panalo kami…nakakahiya kayo! Panalo sa board room…YUCK!

  KAHIT ANONG SABIHIN NIYO…SAN BEDA RED LIONS PARIN ANG MAGCHACHAMPION…

• Grrr!     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 9:47 am
  

  another delusion…

• Mamang Kalbo     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 9:59 am
  

  “Abanilla recounts that he was not aware of the protest until his captain, Jacob Manlapaz, signed the official box score after the game. The CSB head tactician noted that the protest had already been inserted into the box score without his, or Manlapaz’s knowledge. “Apparently, someone asked Jacob to sign the box score with the protest on the game sheet.â€?

  UNETHICAL ang ginawa ng taong ito. Without Abanilla’s knowledge.

  Ganito ba sa NCAA, UNETHICAL?

• Red Blooded     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 11:29 am
  

  If you ask me, the protest was in poor taste. Whatever happened to the spirit of competition? Is St. Benilde so desperate for a win over San Beda that it will resort to extraneous measures beyond the playing court? How meritorious is a win proclaimed in the boardroom when on the floor, it was obvious St. Benilde couldn’t hold a candle to San Beda?

  -Protest in poor taste
  SPORTING CHANCE By Joaquin M. Henson
  http://www.philstar.com/index.php?Sports&p=49&type=2&sec=30&aid=20080722188

• guest     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 11:47 am
  

  sa langit kaya, nag-aaway sina St. Benilde at San Beda?

• Bad Ato     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 12:30 pm
  

  Rules are rules but CSB could have opted to seize the opportunity by being good Christians and accept defeat with pride. This act would have earned them adulation and praise not only in the sport and academic community but from the whole Philippines as well. Right now their fellow alumnus and popular sportwriter Quinito Henson has criticized their protest as done in bad taste.

• Mamang Kalbo     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 12:43 pm
  

  Mahilig siguro kumain ng CRAB ang mga taga-CSB.

  “The protest was done in poor taste”.

• igiboy     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 1:44 pm
  

  @justice

  RULES ARE RULES hindi kba nakakaintindi? at ska kasalanan din naman ni ekwe yan eh

  hindi ako kampi sa csb hindi din ako kampi sa beda

  porket ba sunod sunod ang champion nyo feeling nyo kayo na palagi ang champion?

  panapanahon lang yan may susunod din na season ng ncaa iba naman ang mag cha-champion hindi lang kayo.

• DBIGRED1     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 2:20 pm
  

  @Bad Ato:

  I totally agree! It boils down to values and whatever upbringing people had. I hope CSB reads your comment para naman something good could come out of this.

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 2:56 pm
  

  I will repeat my post:

  Mr. Henson is barking up the wrong tree.

  CSB’s duty is to file a protest for an infraction they feel was unfairly committed against them – nothing more.

  It is not CSB’s duty to decide if it was Ekwe’s fault or if it affected the outcome of the game, or any of the other points he raised in his article. That is the responsibility of the committee deciding the protest.

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 3:02 pm
  

  Mamang Kalbo,

  There is nothing unethical about what Manlapaz did. Yes, he should have informed the head coach about it but that hardly qualifies as being unenthical.

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 3:18 pm
  

  My comments re Quinito Henson’s article:

  1. “If you’re not a stickler for details, you wouldn’t think Ekwe wore a uniform different from his teammatesâ€? and “the “wrong” uniform was nearly identical to the stolen jerseyâ€?
  Ah, the “there are minor differences so what’s wrong with it?� excuse!
  The issue is not about whether the differences are noticeable or not, it’s about wearing the official uniform (refer to the NCAA rulebook).

  2. “Surely, using the wrong uniform was not a deliberate act on Ekwe’s part.â€?
  This is the “he wasn’t aware of the rules so he shouldn’t be penalized� excuse.
  Not a deliberate act means not being aware of the consequences of the act (I looked it up). Ok, I forgive him for that. But someone should tell thim that “ignorance of the law excuses no one.�

  3. “Whatever happened to the spirit of competition?�
  As far as I know the predominant spirit of competition is to respect and abide by all the rules (see any athlete’s oath).
  Clearly, it was SBC that committed the infraction so I think your question is better referred to them.

  4. “And it certainly didn’t make him more formidable as a player. In other words, it had nothing to do with deciding the outcomeâ€? and “wearing it did not cause an advantage or disadvantage to either teamâ€?
  This is the “he wasn’t wearing Superman’s costume so he couldn’t have affected the outcome of the game� excuse.
  Obviously wearing the wrong uniform doesn’t make anyone play better (*duh*) but that is not the point here.
  Ekwe wore the wrong uniform and was, therefore, ineligible to play. Since he was a major contributor to his team, his playing gave an unfair advantage to SBC and affected the outcome of the game.

  5. “and it shouldn’t be used as an excuse for forfeiture because that’s not what basketball’s about.â€?
  First and foremost, basketball (like all sports) is about following rules. The rule is: a player not wearing the official uniform is ineligible to play and the penalty is forfeiture.

  6. “Manlapaz signed the protest sheet with the intention of snatching the victory from San Beda by forfeit. He certainly didn’t sign the sheet for posterity.â€?
  Fact: SBC committed an infraction and it was well within Manlapaz’ right to protest it.
  Whether there was malice or not is irrelevant.
  Frankly, I don’t see why he had malign somebody and yet not show anything to prove it. This, to me, is downright irresponsible.

  7. “Each team in the NCAA has its sights set on bringing San Beda down. If the teams can’t do it on the court, they’ll find some other way.â€?
  Can anyone tell me the relevance of this statement to the issue? Nope, neither can I.
  Aside from it not being relevant, it is a cheap shot at the rest of the NCAA-participating schools. Shame on him!

  Most of his arguments are badly flawed because he did not address the issue directly (some sounded more like angry appeals than logical arguments to me) and two had absolutely no relevance and were cheap shots disguised as arguments.

  If there was anything done in poor taste it was his article.

• DBIGRED1     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 3:20 pm
  

  @LDC:

  Can’t you see through what Abanilla was saying or implying?

  The guy is saying that the protest was not his choice but of his school. They didn’t feel any unfairness at all, my friend. They didn’t even notice the infraction until somebody pointed out for them. And I bet, this guy is not even from CSB!

  CSB, from the onset, never saw anything unfair committed against them. Only after somebody pointed it out for them.

• sumbong sumbong kay bongang bongang bongbong     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 3:21 pm
  

  sumbong nyo na lang kasi sa akin yan, diretso pa ang aksyon dito lamang sa sumbong sumbong kay bingang bongang bong bong… dahil hangang may mga ingitero, hanga’t may mga abusado, hanga’t may mga manloloko at hangang may nagsusumbong nandito lamang ako “isumbong mo kay bonngang bongang bongbong”

• lion's_paw     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 3:30 pm
  

  ibigay na lang natin yan sa CSB, para lang yan yung dati laban ng SBC vs PCU ng sinapak ni Morelos yun isa player ng PCU, thrown out karamihan ng PCU ang beda may 5 players pa, kasi yung Very Dominating Center ng SBC na si Yousif ndi umalis ng bench hehehe panalo beda on that game, hirap pa manalo ang SBC during that season I think 2002 season yun…

  Animo San Beda!!!

• DBIGRED1     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 3:33 pm
  

  Ang babaw mo talaga LDC.

  I bet you are are a die-hard basketball fan but a very frustrated basketball player. Di mo alam ang spirit that these players feel inside the court. That is the reason why you can’t see what Quinito Henson can see.

  You are blind. You might have the mind, but you don’t have the heart (feel). And basketball, my friend, is more of the heart.

  But, cheer up, at least you’re not brain dead.

• nicksy     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 4:00 pm
  

  @LDC,

  I think Your a Very Very VERY intelligent guy,
  to the point you are better than Sir Quinito Henson

  “there was anything done in poor taste it was his article.”-LDC

  well this is an editorial opinion, Duhh, An opinion by a respected columnist.

  peace.

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 4:04 pm
  

  DBIGRED1,

  “The guy is saying that the protest was not his choice but of his school…”
  Yes, that is correct and what he said is within the established procedures. The final step in the protest process is the finalization by a school official (see par. 6 of the article). So technically, it really isn’t his choice (his opinion on the matter was considered by the school, though).

  “..They didn’t feel any unfairness at all, my friend. They didn’t even notice the infraction until somebody pointed out for them…”
  Of course, while the game was ongoing, they didn’t know what was supposed to be “fair,” did they? Ergo, they didn’t know what what was supposed to be “unfair.”

  “…And I bet, this guy is not even from CSB…”
  You bet right, I read that he is from Mapua.

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 4:14 pm
  

  nicksy,

  Thanks, but it is not my intention to be “better” than Quinito Henson.

  I just wanted to point out the flaws in his article, especially his irresponsible statements about Manzano and the rest of the NCAA schools bringing San Beda “down” “some other way.”

• nicksy     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 4:22 pm
  

  “If you ask me, the protest was in poor taste.”
  -Quinito Henson
  (a statement from the starting paragraph after the facts)

  it is not a flaw nor irresponsible statement , it is an Opinion.

  peace.

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 4:24 pm
  

  DBIGRED1,

  “…Di mo alam ang spirit that these players feel inside the court…”
  Lemme guess, when you say “players” you are referring to the SBC players, aren’t you?
  Well, sit down, close your eyes, take a deep breath and think about the CSB players for a while: they played against SBC and lost. Then they find out Ekwe was ineligible to play and was a big factor in the game. How would you feel? It would suck big time!

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 4:40 pm
  

  You are correct. His qualifier “If you ask me” shows that he is stating an opinion (you are wrong, however, as I did not say that was one of flaws or irresponsible statement).

  Hey, it’s my turn to ask: Is the following an opinion? If not, what is it? (ala Geometry: please provide your proof)

  “Manlapaz signed the protest sheet with the intention of snatching the victory from San Beda by forfeit. He certainly didn’t sign the sheet for posterity.”

• redredred     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 4:41 pm
  

  SINO BA NAMAN KASI NAGNAKAW NG JERSEY NI SAM?!
  UMAMIN NA KAYO.
  I’LL HUNT YOU DOWN.

• nicksy     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 4:51 pm
  

  @LDC

  i know that you would brought that statement as an argument, actually if you would see the structure of his article, that statement was in solo paragraph, and as you notice, the signing of Manlapaz was previously mentioned as a fact, and that solo little paragraph was a preparation to his opinion, observed the structure of the article before you comment.

  the problem is that your very Myopic to the issue and disregarding other other subliminal facts and intangibles, you alway want the Rule, the rule, which is good, but in a court the judge does not based his decision entirely from what is written in the rulebook, he also seeks for some intangible, and other facts that is not directly affected to the issue but can be a factor.

  peace.

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 5:03 pm
  

  nicksy,

  Just answer my question, please:

  Is the following an opinion? If not, what is it? (ala Geometry: please provide your proof)

  “Manlapaz signed the protest sheet with the intention of snatching the victory from San Beda by forfeit. He certainly didn’t sign the sheet for posterity.�

• nicksy     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 5:15 pm
  

  the answer is already there, just read it out loud,
  , if you don’t know how to read between the lines, i’ll make is simple, yes it was part of his opinion, just like said before it was a preparation for the editorial,

  Myopic guy, looking always for loopholes, and just always reasoning, a very intelligent person.

• bola     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 5:29 pm
  

  sori, ginawa kong kumot ung jersey ni sam. lamig e

• nicksy     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 5:33 pm
  

  @LDC,

  your Opinion counts, and i Don’t want to argue anymore with you, if you hate the Article and if you think his (Sir Henson) is libelous, i suggest that you get a lawyer and Demand an Apology, or might as well sue him.

  as for me, my opinion that this article was his on behalf an opinion, and no intention to destroy someone.

  peace.

• LDC     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 6:42 pm
  

  rhk111,

  “For the record, the rule is VAGUE…�
  Care to specify which specific rule is vague and why it is?
  Can you paste the rule here so we can both discuss its vagueness?

  “…Di bale, sige, kung ganun gusto nila, fine. Malay mo, makaganti kami. If I were Benilde, I would be very careful in terms of following the rules from hereon. I hope na walang butas na makikita later.â€?
  Oh, you mean if CSB doesn’t protest now and later you find a CSB infraction you won’t file a protest, like you are returning a favor? Is that how you think?

• ric     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 6:49 pm
  

  This doesnt matter to me anymore!

  Importante na lang sakin is for San Beda to beat Letran and turn Letran’s record to 6-1.

• Chief Waka-waka     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 6:50 pm
  

  ang tagal naman ng desisyon. sabihin na kasi kung ano ang parusa para matapos na ang usapan, para matahimik na ang lahat.

• Grrr!     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 7:27 pm
  

  i hope they decide in san beda’s favor. pangit naman na maging 3 straight losses as i forsee the knights beating them too.

• rhk111     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 8:51 pm
  

  I already posted this at 8:54 am, am reposting it AGAIN in case anybody missed it:

  Let me quote this post from “trencher_k� from the gameface.ph forums:

  “Sir Joe, according to Tony Atayde’s column in inboundpass, this was the Rule alluded to:

  Rule #6
  Playing Uniform and School ID

  6.1 All athletes shall wear the OFFICIAL PLAYING TEAM UNIFORM in all the games/matches of the current NCAA Season.

  6.5 Any athlete whose playing uniform does not conform to the
  preceding rules shall be INELIGIBLE to participate in a given game/match.

  9.2 A team shall lose the game by FORFEITURE if and when:

  9.2.1 An INELIGIBLE athlete is fielded or enters the playing court with an intent to play. He and his team shall lose the game/match BY FORFEITURE.

  I guess the controversy stems from the definition of the OFFICIAL PLAYING TEAM UNIFORM which the Rule, as cited, did not define explicitly. Sam was wearing his Bantay-Bata uniform which was basically the exact same uniform except for the placement of the sponsorship logos. I think the same issue was also brought up in the recent UP-Ateneo game where Kirk Long and Vince Burke were also spotted wearing jerseys with logos different from those used by the other ADMU players. UP, however, took the higher ground when it chose not to file the protest.�

• Mo     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 9:07 pm
  

  definitely poor in taste! what a pitiful CSB team that they can only win by protest in not wearing the exactly right uniform. i guess your all desperate to grab that 1 victory by a forfeit. Suck you big time CSB

• Mo     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 9:10 pm
  

  Not a Truly Manly Game! Show Your Manly Stuff Benilde. i despise you all..!! Di na mganda laban ng Letran at Beda nyan! and that because of Gayness of that CSB coach

• DBIGRED1     --1
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 9:41 pm
  

  @LDC:

  If I were from CSB how would I feel? As a player or as a fan? Iba ang feeling non, bro. Here is what you want:

  As a player for CSB, I would feel… elated!!! wow, kahit papano natalo natin sila… YEHEY Thank you, Lo.. (blasphemous babblings follows) but after a few minutes… aha! teka nga muna, where is Ekwe, tignan ko nga yong pinagsasabi nitong taga Mapuang may balak yatang maging fashion designer paglaki, kung tama… OMG, oo nga, di ko na notice yon ah!!! Madaya, madaya, madaya kayo, talo talo talo ang Beda! Yeheyyy Sa wakas!!! Walang kahirap hirap. Then that night, pag uwi, bakit ang hirap ko makatulog? Parang may mali eh…

  As a fan… 2 days after pa… huh bakit yata mayroong celebrasyon duon, makausyoso nga…..
  Fans: NAnalo tayo, nanalo tayo!!! Yehey!! Wooohhh.
  Tanong ko: saan? saan? Saan tayo nanalo?
  Sagot:sa Beda! sa Beda! Talo sila last game kasi sabi ng taga Mapua mali uniform ni Ekwe!!! Kahit tambak tayo ng sang katutak, PANALO TAYO!!! Yeeheeey!!!! Panalo kami, panalo kami!!!
  Maya maya, nagisip ako teka nga muna, panalo kami? sa uniform? basketball game ba yon o fashion show o parada ng mga bading o ano? Never mind… sabi ng school ko magprotest para manalo, so GO GO GO CSB GO

  tsk tsk tsk There… ayos ba LDC

• Chief Waka-waka     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 10:23 pm
  

  San Beda is the better team on the court. CSB is the better team in the boardroom.

• Christian Soler     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 11:26 pm
  

  It’s official: CSB 20, San Beda 0.

• Chief Waka-waka     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 11:35 pm
  

  natalo si San Beda sa holy war sa langit laban kay St. Benilde.

• Chief Waka-waka     +0
  Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 11:35 pm
  

  sabi ni Lord, talo si San Beda dahil hindi niya suot ang kanyang halo.

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 9:36 am
  

  cge ulitan nlang.. rematch.. plus 20 na yung benilde. ganun parin mangyayari dun.. hahabulin namin kayo sa first 5 mins ng 1st qtr. tapos tatambakan namin kayo ng mas malaki pa..

  hihihi.

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 9:54 am
  

  “Manlapaz signed the protest sheet with the intention of snatching the victory from San Beda by forfeit. He certainly didn’t sign the sheet for posterity.�

  syempre opinion yan, DUUHHH!! he made it like that para may dating, para mapansin mo. see, napansin mo.

  di mo man aminin, ganyan din opinion mo about this topic, di ka nlang makawala kasi nanjan na kayo eh.

  hihihi.

  pax!

• LDC     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 9:54 am
  

  clarion,

  You’ll have your chance in the second round. But before that game starts please make sure that the coaching staff doesn’t sneak in Ekwe with the wrong uniform.

• LDC     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 10:36 am
  

  clarion,

  “…di mo man aminin, ganyan din opinion mo about this topic…�

  I don’t know what you’re driving at, but to make things clear about my position in this issue:

  Fact: Ekwe wore the wrong uniform
  Fact: Ekwe played in the game
  Fact: The rule states that all players should wear the official uniform during a game
  Fact: CSB filed a protest

  Opinion: CSB was correct in filing the protest due to the facts above.

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 10:51 am
  

  Opinion: CSB was correct in filing the protest due to the facts above.

  opinion: with the intention of snatching the victory from us..

  hihi..
  nice!

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 10:57 am
  

  yup! i’ll do that.. and i’ll make sure that you cant sneak in and steal sam’s jersey either.

  You’ll have your chance in the second round. — CHANCE? like we need chance.. you need a chance.. your team doesnt have any..

• LDC     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 10:58 am
  

  clarion,

  Fact: Sam Ekwe reported to the coaching staff his uniform was “stolen.”
  Fact: The coaching staff instructed him to use an old uniform and that they will take care of the “problem.”

  Conclusion: SBC cheated.

  So who now had the “intention of snatching the victory?”

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:04 am
  

  who?

  nyhahaha

  btw, our only intention is to win INSIDE THE COURT!

• Grrr!     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:25 am
  

  DEATH to ALL CHEATERS!!!!

• nicksy     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:29 am
  

  @clarion

  Don’t be harsh on LDC, kahit anung sabihin mo hindi magpapatalo yan,hahanap at hahanap yun ng butas sa mga sinasabi mo, he is very righteous, he always go on facts ,facts, facts, and myopic(whether it is good or bad) on the issue.

  peace.

• LDC     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:30 am
  

  Grrr!,

  “DEATH to ALL CHEATERS!!!!”

  ‘Wag naman, forfeiture of the game is enough.

• LDC     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:31 am
  

  sorry, it should read: “…forfeiture of the WIN is enough.”

• Grrr!     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:34 am
  

  @LDC, ah …OK…

  FORFEITURE to ALL CHEATERS!

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:38 am
  

  FORFEITURE to ALL CHEATERS!

  kung ganun kami nalang ang matitirang may WIN?

  lahat bokya.

• Grrr!     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:40 am
  

  yung CONFIRMED CHEATERS lang…

• Grrr!     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 11:43 am
  

  ..kayo ba yun?

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 12:03 pm
  

  sino?

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 12:04 pm
  

  grr, nkakaasar ka tlaga..

  grr.

• clarion     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 12:05 pm
  

  PCU?

• nicksy     +0
  Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 12:12 pm
  

  @Grrr

  Over kill yan para sa mga cheaters, hahaha
  parang “kodigo ni kalatiyaw”, “kung naghuli magnakaw putulin ang mga daliri”, hehehehe

  funny though

  Animo San Beda.
  peace.

• every_knight     +0
  Friday, 25 July 2008 at 9:46 am
  

  kung ayaw nyo gamitin ng jru ang animo.. edi indi n ANIMO RIZAL.. dapat eh

  KEMBOT RIZAL!!! GO! hahaha mga bakla kayo!!!

• Grrr!     +0
  Friday, 25 July 2008 at 9:50 am
  

  @nicksy, okay lang putulin ang daliri, basta huwag lang yun, kasi di na maka shoot at at maka score…i’m talking basketball nothing else…he hehe

• Walmart     +0
  Friday, 25 July 2008 at 10:35 am
  

  Cheaters? How about mga DUWAG na SALIMPUSA lang, na nag aambisyon pang manalo?

• Walmart     +0
  Friday, 25 July 2008 at 10:37 am
  

  Mag cooking, photography, or waiter na lang kayong mga SALIMPUSA, wag na kayo mag basketbol. lol

• kobenatics     +0
  Friday, 25 July 2008 at 3:25 pm
  

  ang kulit ah, forfeited and panalo beda? wow bigat!!! but rules are rules they are made to be followed and organized everything.

  bawi nalang 2nd round.

  BRAVO BASTE!!!!!!!!!

Leave a Comment

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Gallery